mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc18

mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17

Package mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16434/mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

There are no packages with such hard abrt dependency that was added in mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17 and makes impossible to uninstall abrt.

+1 to what nucleo said, such dependency bloat is really unhelpful.

I guess the added script would be better placed in the ABRT package(s); nucleo pointed me to this existing example on IRC: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=3421091

I agree, requiring abrt is a little heavy. After some digging I notice that
it would be sufficient to just depend on the presence of libreport-filesystem.
Ie. you will end up with the 4 line script installed, but you can get rid of
abrt if you like[1].

Putting the script into the abrt package does not make sense. It means if a
script needs to be changed or enhanced, every package maintainer needs to
coordinate with the abrt package maintainer to get an update out. It is clearly
the intention of abrt for packages to provide their own scripts, since only the
package maintainers know what they look for.

Second, creating a sub-package doesn't make sense for a 4-line script. The
example you give for the xorg analyser is different, since it provides it's
own script to analyse the output as well.

I'll try and push this change out today.

Jes

1: That said, if you file a bug against mdadm, just make sure you send me
   *everything* I would get with the abrt script, or I will reserve the
   right to ignore your bug report.

*** Bug 868201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-12.fc17

mdadm-3.2.5-13.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-13.fc17

=============================================================================================================================
 Package                       Arch                   Version                          Repository                      Größe
=============================================================================================================================
Aktualisieren:
 mdadm                         x86_64                 3.2.5-12.fc17                    updates-testing                 336 k
Als Abhängigkeiten installiert:
 abrt                          x86_64                 2.0.16-1.fc17                    updates-testing                 223 k
 abrt-libs                     x86_64                 2.0.16-1.fc17                    updates-testing                  70 k
 btparser                      x86_64                 0.20-1.fc17                      updates-testing                 432 k
 elfutils-libs                 x86_64                 0.154-2.fc17                     updates                         185 k

Vorgangsübersicht
=============================================================================================================================
Installieren             ( 4 Dependent packages)
Upgrade       1 Package

-13 will show up shortly in updates-testing, if you cannot wait, you can get
it here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=361095

We all understand the problem here, no point in spamming the bz with it all
again.

no spam - my bugreport was marked as duplicated with this here, i received a notify about the 3.2.5-12.fc17 build which should solve the problem and pinged back that it is not the case (not knowing that the same time the next build arrives)

(In reply to comment #13)
> no spam - my bugreport was marked as duplicated with this here, i received a
> notify about the 3.2.5-12.fc17 build which should solve the problem and
> pinged back that it is not the case (not knowing that the same time the next
> build arrives)

-13 was already announced in the system, but you still reported against -12.

In addition, please keep with the language of the BZ when you post.

mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc17

mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc18

Due to breakage in bodhi, the updates will be mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc1[78] - they
should show up in the updates-testing repositories within the next 24 hours
or so.

Package mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc17:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc17'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16487/mdadm-3.2.5-14.fc17
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc18

mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc17

mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

mdadm-3.2.6-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.