Bug 892667
| Summary: | 3.1.2 - upgrade from 4.9-113.4 (z-stream) to 4.9.6-44.1 (GA) fails as vdsm doesn't require correct selinux-policy package | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Chris Pelland <cpelland> |
| Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Leonid Natapov <lnatapov> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | abaron, abgupta, bazulay, chetan, cpelland, danken, dougsland, fsimonce, hateya, iheim, ilvovsky, lpeer, michal.skrivanek, pm-eus, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | infra | ||
| Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.9.6-45.1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
A VDSM upgrade from version 4.9-113.4 (z-stream) to 4.9.6-44.1 (GA) failed because VDSM did not have a dependency on the updated selinux-policy package which contained the sanlock_use_nfs and sanlock_use_fusefs booleans. This update adds the missing booleans, and VDSM upgrade succeeds.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-04 21:12:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 889122, 892670 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Chris Pelland
2013-01-07 14:55:28 UTC
fixed. the following package has been required sanlock_use_fusefs added selinux-policy 3.7.19-155.5 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0228.html *** Bug 973827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |