Description of problem: admin@internal doesn't see any VMs or pools in User Portal. (Also visible in si26.1) Requested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902341#c8 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sf4 (also in si26.1) How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a pool and/or vm in Admin Portal 2. log as admin@internal in User Portal 3. Actual results: no VMs/pools Expected results: admin@internal should see pools/VMs in User Portal by default Additional info: In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902341#c7 it is stated that users in User Portal should see pool itself instead of individual pooled VMs.
admin@internal, like any other user, should see only VMs/Pools which are associated with *User* permissions [i.e. not admin permissions (e.g. SuperUser)] for that user. Regarding the "Additional info:" in the description: IIUC, this is what bug 904984 is about. So not sure exactly what this bug is about: Jiri - can you please clarify that? maybe we are missing here the details regarding admin@internal exact permissions?
In sf4, admin@internal has on system SuperUser and PowerUserRole roles by default. In si26.1, admin@internal has SuperRules role on system only by default. In both versions, admin@internal cannot see VMs/pools in User Portal. BZ904984 states that any user which has UserRole on system, does not see pool(s) but individual pooled VMs in User Portal. I would say that first admin@internal should be able to see VMs by default in User Portal.
The user portal, in contrast to the admin portal, should only show you objects you have user permissions on, even if you are an administrator. An administrator would login to the user portal only if he wants to do user oriented things, and in that case he should only see his objects, and not all the objects. So, in my opinion, this bug should be closed.