RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 905128 - [CRASH] OpenJDK-1.7.0 while using NSS security provider and kerberos
Summary: [CRASH] OpenJDK-1.7.0 while using NSS security provider and kerberos
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: java-1.7.0-openjdk
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andrew John Hughes
QA Contact: Lukáš Zachar
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 906325 907090 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 831734 904766 960054 998596
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-01-28 16:31 UTC by Alon Bar-Lev
Modified: 2013-11-21 11:12 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 11:12:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
GSSAPITest.java (1.75 KB, text/x-java)
2013-01-28 16:31 UTC, Alon Bar-Lev 		no flags Details
krb5.conf (307 bytes, text/plain)
2013-01-28 16:33 UTC, Alon Bar-Lev 		no flags Details
jaas.conf (164 bytes, text/plain)
2013-01-28 16:34 UTC, Alon Bar-Lev 		no flags Details
hs_err_pid17595.log (36.76 KB, text/plain)
2013-01-28 16:35 UTC, Alon Bar-Lev 		no flags Details
Don't make an update call in doFinal for non-block ciphers (2.22 KB, patch)
2013-01-29 18:23 UTC, Andrew John Hughes 		no flags Details | Diff
Revised patch that checks blockBuffer rather than blockBufferLen (2.22 KB, patch)
2013-01-31 17:28 UTC, Andrew John Hughes 		no flags Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1611 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE java-1.7.0-openjdk bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:39:02 UTC

Description Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:31:50 UTC 
Created attachment 689075 [details]
GSSAPITest.java

In the attempt to boost jre performance (bug#831734), kerberos JAAS is broken.

It causes SIGSEGV when trying to authenticate.

Attached a sample program to reproduce, logs.

Stack: [0x00007f268b227000,0x00007f268b328000],  sp=0x00007f268b324b10,  free space=1014k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V  [libjvm.so+0x5d9e5f]  JNI_CreateJavaVM+0xd40f
C  [libj2pkcs11.so+0x6062]  Java_sun_security_pkcs11_wrapper_PKCS11_C_1EncryptUpdate+0xd2
j  sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11.C_EncryptUpdate(JJ[BIIJ[BII)I+0
j  sun.security.pkcs11.P11Cipher.implDoFinal([BII)I+115
j  sun.security.pkcs11.P11Cipher.engineDoFinal([BII[BI)I+44
j  sun.security.pkcs11.P11Cipher.engineDoFinal([BII)[B+16
j  javax.crypto.Cipher.doFinal([BII)[B+45
j  sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.dk.ArcFourCrypto.encrypt([BI[B[B[BII)[B+175
j  sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.ArcFourHmac.encrypt([BI[B[BII)[B+12
j  sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.ArcFourHmacEType.encrypt([B[B[BI)[B+8
j  sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.ArcFourHmacEType.encrypt([B[BI)[B+14
j  sun.security.krb5.EncryptedData.<init>(Lsun/security/krb5/EncryptionKey;[BI)V+22
j  sun.security.krb5.KrbAsReq.<init>(Lsun/security/krb5/EncryptionKey;Lsun/security/krb5/internal/KDCOptions;Lsun/security/krb5/PrincipalName;Lsun/security/krb5/PrincipalName;Lsun/security/krb5/internal/KerberosTime;Lsun/security/krb5/internal/KerberosTime;Lsun/security/krb5/internal/KerberosTime;[ILsun/security/krb5/internal/HostAddresses;)V+147


Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 Beta (Santiago)

Packages:
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.11-2.4.0.2.el6.x86_64
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.11-2.4.0.2.el6.x86_64
nss-3.14.0.0-12.el6.x86_64
nss-util-3.14.0.0-1.el6.x86_64
nss-tools-3.14.0.0-12.el6.x86_64
nss_compat_ossl-0.9.6-1.el6.x86_64
nss-sysinit-3.14.0.0-12.el6.x86_64
Comment 1 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:32:29 UTC 
Comment on attachment 689075 [details]
GSSAPITest.java

Sample program.
Comment 2 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:33:50 UTC 
Created attachment 689076 [details]
krb5.conf
Comment 3 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:34:13 UTC 
Created attachment 689077 [details]
jaas.conf
Comment 4 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:35:04 UTC 
Created attachment 689096 [details]
hs_err_pid17595.log

Dump
Comment 5 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:36:55 UTC 
Workaround: Revert to the default java security provider.
Comment 7 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-01-28 16:46:54 UTC 
Unrelated note:

Settings of jvm should be the defaults of openjdk settings.

Applications/administrators that wish to boost their performance can actively load security provider of their choice.

Changing the system width configuration of jvm and effecting all applications should have been avoided.
Comment 8 Andrew John Hughes 2013-01-29 18:21:55 UTC 
It seems the TCK doesn't really test non-block ciphers throughly.  The fix is fairly trivial; just a state that wasn't fully accounted for.
Comment 9 Andrew John Hughes 2013-01-29 18:23:04 UTC 
Created attachment 689985 [details]
Don't make an update call in doFinal for non-block ciphers
Comment 10 Deepak Bhole 2013-01-29 18:25:13 UTC 
We have reverted the errata which should make RHEV work again (with the version in 6.3.z/older 6.4 composes).
Comment 13 RHEL Program Management 2013-01-29 18:49:41 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.
Comment 14 Yaniv Kaul 2013-01-31 13:30:58 UTC 
*** Bug 906325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Andrew John Hughes 2013-01-31 17:28:44 UTC 
Created attachment 691121 [details]
Revised patch that checks blockBuffer rather than blockBufferLen

It turns out some TCK tests started failing because there are valid cases with an empty block buffer.  So we test for the actual failure case (no blockBuffer at all) rather than trying to be clever.
Comment 16 Deepak Bhole 2013-02-14 21:10:33 UTC 
*** Bug 907090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Barak 2013-05-30 13:08:53 UTC 
Replacing the openJdk rpm on a 6.4 host with a 6.5 build might create a lot of none relevant noise.

However if we get a 6.4 (somwhat stable build) we can give it a quick test.

BTW the right way to test it is:

1. install vanilla rhel-XXX
   - make sure the new openJdk is installed
2. install ovirt-engine
3. join a domain
4. login
Comment 31 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 11:12:37 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1611.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.