Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/zeld/var/master/bittwist.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.github.com/zeld/var/master/bittwist-2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Bit-Twist is a simple yet powerful libpcap-based Ethernet packet generator. It is designed to complement tcpdump, which by itself has done a great job at capturing network traffic. With Bit-Twist, you can now regenerate your captured traffic onto a live network! Packets are generated from tcpdump trace file (.pcap file). Bit-Twist also comes with a comprehensive trace file editor to allow you to change the contents of a trace file. Generally, packet generator is useful in simulating networking traffic or scenario, testing firewall, IDS, and IPS, and troubleshooting various network problems. Fedora Account System Username: I do not have any account... i'm not able to make account because in the register form there is an error...
Hi Giuseppe About review process Perhaps you have tried to register at any time when the platform was not available, however, and the expectation that you are searching a different url, you retry with this. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ These links may be useful: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Use_rpmlint Is good practice paste the rpmlint output in the review, and at least make a build scratch on koji and paste the link in the review https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#Scratch_Builds Please tag the field "Blocks" with the word FE-NEEDSPONSOR. So, will let you know the sponsors you need sponsorship About the package I have not thoroughly checked the package, but at first glance, I give some recommendations You have a typo in this line URL: http://http://bittwist.sourceforge.net/ in %install make install prefix=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr should be make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} PREFIX=%{_prefix} (if $DESTDIR supports) Check it $ rpm --eval %{_prefix} /usr the description should not be more than 80 characters per line, rpmlit complains with description-line-too-long - Please do honors applicable compiler flags, Use %{optflags} Check it $ rpm --eval %{optflags} -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic Check the makefile and do the patch, (do not forget to send the patch to upstream) bittwist: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(SRC)/bittwist.c -o $(SRC)/bittwist -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lpcap bittwiste: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(SRC)/bittwiste.c -o $(SRC)/bittwiste -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lpcap - the tag license is wrong License: GPL2 should be License: GPLv2 the changelog is wrong %changelog * Fri Feb 15 2013 Giuseppe Marco Randazzo <gmrandazzo> - first build for bittwist should be %changelog * Fri Feb 15 2013 Giuseppe Marco Randazzo <gmrandazzo> - 2.0-1 - first build for bittwist https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs - Don't needed %defattr(-,root,root) Kind Regards
Giuseppe, are you still interested to go on with this package?
Giuseppe?
Hello, yes i am still interested.... sorry for the delay!! :-) Here all the modifications!! I hope now the spec file and the patch are fine! Thanks!! Giuseppe Marco Randazzo
Created attachment 911551 [details] bittwist new spec file New Bitwist spec file
Created attachment 911552 [details] bittwist-Makefile patch The bittwist-Makefile patch. ~ Added the DESTDIR support ~ Fixed the make procedure to use the optflags
Can you please provide updated files (spec and SRPM)? Thanks.
Created attachment 918154 [details] bittwist-2.0-2 SRC RPM 2014-07-15 SRC RPM bittwist 2.0-2
Created attachment 918155 [details] bittwist spec file 2014-07-15 bittwist spec file 2014-07-15
Created attachment 918156 [details] bittwist Make file patch 2014-07-15 bittwist 2.0-2 Make file patch 2014-07-15
Can you please provide updated files (spec and SRPM)? Not as attachment to the report but rather as links. Thanks.
I'm still interested in know what is the fas of Giuseppe and if still he hasn't been sponsored. Like says Fabian, Giuseppe, please append the links of the spec and SRPM, usually reviewers use a tool named fedora-review, that expects those links be available at the review.
Dear all, thank you for your support and interest. I found a workaround package, tcpreply. With this message I would like to close this package request. Best regards, GMR
You mean tcpreplay https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tcpreplay