This bug is a placeholder for this functionality and a detailed requirements list will be provided later. This is opened now to triage and block all the RFE's that depend on this infrastructure. Basic concepts are: - The end user scheduler is isolated from the engine and the DB - unlike the actual plug-in. - Must provide a way to collect enough info to form a decision - The API should have the option to create binding to a scripting language TBD (SDK) The plug-in is based on the infra in bug 912059 that provide infrastructure for scheduler plug in that is running within the engine scope. So the plugin is running within the engine scope while providing interface to an external interface.
Hi Doron, can you please proofread the description in the Doc Text field for accuracy? I've tried to cover this bug and bug 912059 with one release note text. If you think they should be addressed separately, let me know.
(In reply to Cheryn Tan from comment #4) > Hi Doron, can you please proofread the description in the Doc Text field for > accuracy? I've tried to cover this bug and bug 912059 with one release note > text. If you think they should be addressed separately, let me know. Hi Cheryn, Thanks. I updated the text, and as you can see I think bug 912059 should provide the details for adding user code. The current bug handles the new scheduler implementation.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0038.html