Description of problem: Can not extend columns in add virtual disk window. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhevm-backend-3.2.0-10.16.master.el6ev.noarch rhevm-webadmin-portal-3.2.0-10.16.master.el6ev.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create VM. 2. Under 'virtual machines' tab Click 'add' under disks tab. 3. Try to extend the columns Actual results: User can not extend columns. Expected results: User should be able to extend columns.
please add screen shot.
Created attachment 730630 [details] screenshot Screenshot attached. The columns in this windows cannot be extended
Daniel, isn't this a dup of a generic feature to be able to resize columns?
(In reply to comment #3) > Daniel, isn't this a dup of a generic feature to be able to resize columns? Yes, resizable columns support is currently available only for main-tabs tables. I.e. tables in dialogs (or sub-tabs) don't support column resizing.
(In reply to Daniel Erez from comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Daniel, isn't this a dup of a generic feature to be able to resize columns? > > Yes, resizable columns support is currently available only for main-tabs > tables. I.e. tables in dialogs (or sub-tabs) don't support column resizing. Bug 915950 adds support for subtabs, but we still need to handle dialogs
with the two other implemented, how big of an effort is this?
(In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #6) > with the two other implemented, how big of an effort is this? The tables in disk dialog are similar to the ones in storage dialog; i.e. a tree with outer/inner tables. While the inner tables can easily support resizable columns, the outer tables will require a new infrastructure not currently supported (needed also for tree based sub-tabs).
(In reply to Daniel Erez from comment #7) > (In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #6) > > with the two other implemented, how big of an effort is this? > > The tables in disk dialog are similar to the ones in storage dialog; > i.e. a tree with outer/inner tables. While the inner tables can easily > support resizable columns, the outer tables will require a new > infrastructure not currently supported (needed also for tree based sub-tabs). Einav - is this in your future plans?
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #9) > (In reply to Daniel Erez from comment #7) > > (In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #6) > > > with the two other implemented, how big of an effort is this? > > > > The tables in disk dialog are similar to the ones in storage dialog; > > i.e. a tree with outer/inner tables. While the inner tables can easily > > support resizable columns, the outer tables will require a new > > infrastructure not currently supported (needed also for tree based sub-tabs). > Einav - is this in your future plans? not at the moment... can you please open a 'ux' RFE that will block this BZ?
(In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #10) > (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #9) > > (In reply to Daniel Erez from comment #7) > > > (In reply to Itamar Heim from comment #6) > > > > with the two other implemented, how big of an effort is this? > > > > > > The tables in disk dialog are similar to the ones in storage dialog; > > > i.e. a tree with outer/inner tables. While the inner tables can easily > > > support resizable columns, the outer tables will require a new > > > infrastructure not currently supported (needed also for tree based sub-tabs). > > Einav - is this in your future plans? > > not at the moment... can you please open a 'ux' RFE that will block this BZ? Daniel - can you please file this RFE? I'm sure you'd do a better job than me describing what EXACTLY we need here. Thanks!
It seems that this bug addresses only column resizing in attach disk dialog, which already been resolved while ago (3.2 build) by http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/14445/. Moving to ON_QA for verification. @Aharon - up to you whether to verify or close as current release.
Filed bug 1147633 as an RFE for addressing the issue described in comment #7.
Columns are resizealbe in the add disk dialog for attach disk. Verified using vt3.1
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0158.html