Bug 963597 - Rebase Subscription Manager for RHEL 5.10
Summary: Rebase Subscription Manager for RHEL 5.10
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager
Version: 5.10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: candlepin-bugs
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 963413
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-16 08:26 UTC by Libor Miksik
Modified: 2013-10-01 06:23 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-01 06:23:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1387 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager and python-rhsm bug fix and enhancement update 2013-10-01 10:19:22 UTC

Description Libor Miksik 2013-05-16 08:26:20 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #963413 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.9 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 5 John Sefler 2013-08-28 21:10:19 UTC 
Errata RHBA-2013:14910 RHEL-5.9.Z has been filed.
This errata provides subscription-manager-1.8 (scheduled for release with RHEL5.10)
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/advisory/14910

QE coverage of subscription-manager-1.8 has been executed during the RHEL510 test cycle.
All functional issues regarding subscription-manager-1.8 (including execution on a RHEL59 deployment have been processed as separate RHEL510 bugs).

The primary purpose for this package rebase on RHEL-5.9.Z was to include updates needed to accommodate new 2013 Pricing Model subscriptions on a RHEL-5.9 system.

Moving this rebase bug to VERIFIED
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-10-01 06:23:26 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1387.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.