Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 966775
[RHEL 6.4] BUG glibc causing double-whetstone performance degradation when compared to RHEL 6.3.
Last modified: 2016-11-24 07:15:39 EST
Description of problem: When running UnixBench5.1.3 tests on a RHEL6.4 system with the latest glibc version there is a noticeable performance loss in the double-whetstone test (around 50% difference). When using the patched glibc from BZ964044, http://people.redhat.com/yoguma/.bz892635 there is still about a 20% loss in performance. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): glibc-2.12-1.107.el6.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.107.el6.1.bz892635.x86_64 How reproducible: always. Steps to Reproduce: - Build a RHEL6.3 x86_64 system, mine is built with 4 CPU, 4GB memory. - Download, compile UnixBench5.1.3.tgz from http://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench/downloads/list - The one benchmark number they are checking on is the double-whetstone run, the others are within a <10% gap which they seem to be satisfied with. # ./Run -c 1 -i 20 whets - gather the Results - Build a RHEL6.4.z system with latest packages and run UnixBench, gather results - Install the patch glibc packages from here: http://people.redhat.com/yoguma/.bz892635/ and rebuild, re-run UnixBench. gather results. Actual results: RHEL6.4.z glibc run is 40% slower than 6.3, and 6.4 + patch glibc is still 20% slower than 6.3. Expected results: Same or better performance. Additional info:
I'll take this.
Created attachment 758173 [details] Candidate fix
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1605.html