Description of problem: The virt-viewer Spice client does not respect the auto-conf setting passed from controller. This results in a guest being configured for 2 displays and not automatically enabling the 2nd monitor if the user has 2 monitors on their client machine. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): virt-viewer-0.5.3-25 (3.2 beta client) How reproducible: Very Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create VM with only 1 display configured 2. Install rhev-tools-3.1-9 3. Seal the VM with sysprep utility and create a template from it 4. Create a pool of VMs from that template and configure them to have 2 displays Actual results: Users connect with virt-viewer and *only 1 display* appears. The user has to open the Windows display GUI and enable the 2nd monitor manually. Expected results: The configuration of the VM to have 2 displays should cause virt-viewer to detect if the client also has 2 displays and automatically open up (enable) the 2nd display in the guest. Additional info: This is a big enough issue that I am formally requesting a GA (or if that's not possible, a Z stream) patch to 3.2. Here's what the behavior was with the old spicec: 1. Create VM with only 1 display configured 2. Install rhev-tools-3.1-9 3. Seal the VM with sysprep utility and create a template from it 4. Create a pool of VMs from that template and configure them to have 2 displays 5. Users connect with old spicec and 2 displays appear
patch sent: https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2013-May/msg00088.html This bug is the result of a lack of specification (there was a FIXME in the code). It has not been reported before, after 1y of RHEL6 and 6 months of RHEVM integration. I think we could just reconsider the severity. Fortunately, the solution is simple.
This bug is currently attached to errata RHEA-2013:15512. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thanks in advance.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0034.html