Description of problem: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/unbound-anchor from 'add_name' accesses on the directory root.anchor.1631-0. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests *************************** If you believe that unbound-anchor should be allowed add_name access on the root.anchor.1631-0 directory by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # grep unbound-anchor /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:named_conf_t:s0 Target Objects root.anchor.1631-0 [ dir ] Source unbound-anchor Source Path /usr/sbin/unbound-anchor Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages unbound-libs-1.4.19-5.fc19.x86_64 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.12.1-44.fc19.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 3.9.4-300.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri May 24 22:17:06 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 1 First Seen 2013-05-29 04:53:54 EDT Last Seen 2013-05-29 04:53:54 EDT Local ID d10e451d-677d-4bfb-a9d2-14148a6708aa Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1369817634.921:405): avc: denied { add_name } for pid=1631 comm="unbound-anchor" name="root.anchor.1631-0" scontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:named_conf_t:s0 tclass=dir type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1369817634.921:405): arch=x86_64 syscall=open success=no exit=EACCES a0=7fff4632cbc0 a1=241 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1631 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 ses=4294967295 tty=(none) comm=unbound-anchor exe=/usr/sbin/unbound-anchor subj=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 key=(null) Hash: unbound-anchor,named_t,named_conf_t,dir,add_name Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.1.4 hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 3.9.4-300.fc19.x86_64 type: libreport Potential duplicate: bug 962985
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 968216 ***