Bug 969271 - Review Request: cometd - A scalable HTTP-based event routing bus
Summary: Review Request: cometd - A scalable HTTP-based event routing bus
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 968136
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-31 06:15 UTC by gil cattaneo
Modified: 2021-10-05 17:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:47:10 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 52554 0 master ABANDONED spagobi: added cometd dependency 2016-02-10 13:31:01 UTC

Description gil cattaneo 2013-05-31 06:15:08 UTC
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/cometd.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/cometd-2.6.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: 
Cometd is a scalable HTTP-based event routing bus that uses
a Ajax Push technology pattern known as Comet. The term
'Comet' was coined by Alex Russell in his post Comet: Low
Latency Data for the Browser.
Fedora Account System Username: gil

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2013-06-29 20:36:33 UTC
warning this release dont support jetty 9.x ... Waiting for 3.x series

Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-23 17:42:51 UTC
gil's scratch build of cometd-3.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12663856

Comment 5 Upstream Release Monitoring 2016-01-23 18:09:35 UTC
gil's scratch build of cometd-3.0.9-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12663900

Comment 6 Raphael Groner 2016-07-14 14:01:28 UTC
Can we do another review swap?

Comment 7 gil cattaneo 2016-07-14 15:38:56 UTC
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #6)
> Can we do another review swap?

yes but not for this:
please, choose one of these:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356596
block this one 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
thanks in advance

Comment 8 Raphael Groner 2016-10-02 19:57:07 UTC
Please, take some time to look into bug #1380942.

Comment 9 gil cattaneo 2016-10-02 20:36:04 UTC
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8)
> Please, take some time to look into bug #1380942.

Please stop, i dont care now.

Comment 10 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:48:12 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 11 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:47:10 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.