Bug 973339 - Up front coverage of PackStack networking decisions and requirements.
Summary: Up front coverage of PackStack networking decisions and requirements.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Getting_Started_Guide
Version: 3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.0
Assignee: Deepti Navale
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1011085
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-06-11 17:53 UTC by Stephen Gordon
Modified: 2014-01-06 03:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-06 03:42:39 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Stephen Gordon 2013-06-11 17:53:21 UTC
> * 4.2 - We need an upfront discussion of the decisions that need to be
> made, at least for the networking service. We need to explain the choice
> between quantum and nova networking, how its selected, and then
> throughout the section show which options apply to nova vs quantum
> networking. With quantum, we need to similarly cover the choice of
> plugins and which options apply to each plugin. Also, for quantum (or
> nova's VlanManager), we need to at least mention the need for a switch
> that trunks a range of VLANs if doing a multi-node deployment.

Acknowledged, but I think this is an area where we are really struggling for traction. It's easier to say "contrast Nova vs Quantum" than it is to actually do it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.