Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 978350

Summary: ThinLVM and NetApp NFS drivers.
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Stephen Gordon <sgordon>
Component: doc-Installation_and_Configuration_GuideAssignee: Don Domingo <ddomingo>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Martin Lopes <mlopes>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.0CC: ddomingo, eharney, scohen, slong, sradvan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: 5.0 (RHEL 7)Flags: scohen: needinfo+
scohen: needinfo+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: docs-rhos5-ups docs-rhos5-icg-others
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-04 13:07:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 984923, 1185150, 1345775    

Description Stephen Gordon 2013-06-26 12:37:08 UTC
Apparently ThinLVM and NetApp NFS should be listed as supported block storage drivers. This requires updates to the Cinder material and the common introduction.

>> going trough the install doc I noticed the following in the Volume
>> Service Specific Configuration:
>>
>> """
>> The service includes volume drivers for a number of block storage
>> providers. Supported drivers for LVM, NFS, and Red Hat Storage are
>> included.
>> """
>>
>> I think we ship a number of additional drivers too, notably NetApp and
>> EMC and the ThinLVM. There are others too.
>>
>> Do we avoid mentioning those for a supportability problem or are they
>> just missing from the list?
>
> We also package networking plug-ins other than linuxbridge and openvswitch as well, but we only highlight those that were actually tested and therefore will be supported via GSS. If there was test coverage of additional drivers than by all means provide that information.

ThinLVM and NetApp NFS

Thanks!!
-- 
Giulio Fidente

I think it was originally written with RHOS 2.1 in mind, which didn't
have ThinLVM.  Any other omissions were only based on which drivers we
had prioritized for QE testing.

--
Eric Harney

Comment 14 Don Domingo 2014-04-28 00:27:25 UTC
Setting to HIGH so we can keep track of it better.

Comment 16 Martin Lopes 2014-08-28 04:05:45 UTC
Looks good to me. Verified.