Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1185150

Summary: [Docs] [Cinder] [RFE] Provide an overview of consistency groups
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Andrew Dahms <adahms>
Component: documentationAssignee: Don Domingo <ddomingo>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Yogev Rabl <yrabl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: adahms, ddomingo, eharney, markmc, rhos-integ, sclewis, scohen, yeylon, yrabl
Target Milestone: Upstream M3Keywords: Documentation, FutureFeature, OtherQA
Target Release: 6.0 (Juno)Flags: scohen: needinfo+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/consistency-groups
Whiteboard: upstream_milestone_juno-3 upstream_definition_approved upstream_status_implemented
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
The Block Storage service now allows you to set Consistency Groups. With this, you can group multiple volumes together as a single entity; this, in turn, allows you to perform operations on multiple volumes (for example, create snapshots) at once, rather than individually. For this release, the Consistency Groups feature is only supported through the IBM Storwize driver.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1101378
: 1345775 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-25 02:35:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 978350, 1101378    
Bug Blocks: 1216994, 1242908, 1345775    

Comment 2 Andrew Dahms 2015-01-23 05:23:05 UTC 
Assigning to Don, who is the designated author for Cinder.

Don, this looks like a new feature that allows users to create a group of volumes. Perhaps a good candidate for the Administration Guide?
Comment 3 Andrew Dahms 2015-02-11 04:52:33 UTC 
Assigning to Don, who is the designated author for Cinder.
Comment 23 Yogev Rabl 2015-06-24 08:57:36 UTC 
I can give +1 easily for this section, it is clear and gives more than 1 option with the set of considerations.
Comment 24 Andrew Dahms 2015-11-25 02:35:43 UTC 
This content is now live on the Customer Portal.

Closing.