Bug 988172
| Summary: | Installation Guide should indicate which features of RHEV that spicec and the RHEL 6.4 version of virt-viewer do not support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Bryan Yount <byount> | |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Tim Hildred <thildred> | |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | acathrow, alyoung, bdoran, byount, dblechte, dsirrine, jduncan, lbopf, tmichett, yeylon | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 998191 (view as bug list) | Environment: |
Build: CSProcessor Builder Version 1.10
Build Name: 12875, Installation Guide-3.2-6
Build Date: 20-06-2013 11:28:46
Topic ID: 7848-429866 [Latest]
|
|
| Last Closed: | 2014-04-07 03:07:24 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | Docs | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 998191 | |||
|
Description
Bryan Yount
2013-07-25 00:59:07 UTC
Hey Bryan, Can you provide a list of unsupported features in the RHEL 5 spicec client? - spice proxy - wan optimizations - ?? Do any of the other clients in that list also have limitations, or are they otherwise offering the same feature set? Hey Tim, sorry it took me a few days to get back to you as I was out of the office last week. Bugzilla really needs an Out of Office indicator. (In reply to Tim Hildred from comment #2) > Can you provide a list of unsupported features in the RHEL 5 spicec client? > > - spice proxy > - wan optimizations > - ?? - Dynamic resolution resizing and scaling Those were the only 3 things I could think of. We may need to ask Andy to verify that for us. Setting needinfo on him. > Do any of the other clients in that list also have limitations, or are they > otherwise offering the same feature set? I believe RHEL 5 is the exception because it's the only OS on that list that is still stuck with "spicec" instead of "virt-viewer". David - what would be on the list. I presume wan, mime type support, proxy Hey Bryan, That changes things a bit. The simplest way for me to understand is: The RHEL 5 SPICE (spicec) client does not support: - WAN optimizations - dynamic console resizing - proxying - mime types The RHEL 6.4 SPICE client (virt-viewer) does not support: - ??? Those features are supported in the following operating systems using the following clients - Operating System : Client - ??? : ??? Thanks Bryan. I've added a note about RHEL 5 that will probably be in the next z stream for 3.2. I'll add more when I hear more, but it may not be backported to 3.2.z in the immediate future. (In reply to Tim Hildred from comment #6) > The RHEL 6.4 SPICE client (virt-viewer) does not support: > - ??? - proxying That's the only big feature I know of worth mentioning in the docs. Maybe David can also weigh in here? > Those features are supported in the following operating systems using the > following clients > - Operating System : Client > - ??? : ??? Not entirely sure how to help fill this list out. But I think you're looking for what operating systems and clients support all of the RHEV 3.2 features? If so, then... Windows XP : virt-viewer-0.5.3-25 or higher Windows 7 : virt-viewer-0.5.3-25 or higher And eventually we'll add RHEL 6.5 to that list. Hope this helps. Hey David, Can you help me fill in the blanks in comment #6? We're trying to get this bug fix backported into the upcoming 3.2.z release. It looks like the only SPICE clients that support all of the newer RHEV/SPICE features are Windows clients? For the record, RHEL 6.4 gets virt-viewer-0.5.2-18.el6_4.2.x86_64. I've moved the information about which features are supported. Now, the info is in a "note" directly after the client it applies to. Should be much clearer now. |