Bug 993730 - dotconf possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change
Summary: dotconf possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dotconf
Version: 20
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Robinson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F20UnversionedDocDirs
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-06 11:53 UTC by Ville Skyttä
Modified: 2013-12-21 23:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-21 23:33:43 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ville Skyttä 2013-08-06 11:53:48 UTC
dotconf was identified as a package possibly needing maintainer attention
due to the F-20 unversioned doc dir change. The identification is not
foolproof, it is basically this grep:

    grep -E "(/doc|_docdir|_defaultdocdir).+version" *.spec

Please review your package and make the appropriate changes, if any. A
good starting point is checking the lines output by the above grep for
your specfile. For the vast majority of packages, after the changes,
the expected outcome is that documentation dirs in /usr/share/doc
should no longer contain the package version.

More information and tips:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183943
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/183942/focus=183973

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2013-08-08 10:17:04 UTC
A little explanation why something's not a bug would be welcome... anyway this is a bug, docs in -devel should be installed to /usr/share/doc/dotconf-devel, not /usr/share/doc/dotconf-devel-1.3.

Additionally, the -devel package owns the /usr/share/doc and everything in /usr/share/doc/dotconf dirs (duplicated with main package) which it shouldn't.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4238070

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2013-09-16 16:52:44 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle.
Changing version to '20'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2013-12-21 23:33:43 UTC
Fixed in Rawhide via bug 1001258, leaving F20 to maintainers.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.