Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 995128

Summary: Add a UEFI not compatible arch (i686)
Product: [Retired] Fedora Documentation Reporter: Kevin Raymond <kraymond>
Component: install-guideAssignee: Pete Travis <me>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Docs QA <docs-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: develCC: alan, me, pbokoc, zach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-27 22:59:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kevin Raymond 2013-08-08 15:19:01 UTC 
Please add that the i686 releases are not UEFI compatible on the following section:

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/ch-new-users.html#sn-which-arch

This is the one we use to choose the arch, that's where it should fit, more than in table 3.1 (Boot and installation media) or Chap 7 (Booting the Installer).

Related to BZ#994854

Thanks,
Comment 1 alan 2013-12-02 12:00:56 UTC 
Better yet make them UEFI compatible as there are 32bit UEFI platforms still being produced that run Windows 8/32bit.
Comment 2 Pete Travis 2014-01-26 04:56:49 UTC 
I'll add a note on the subject, thanks Kevin.

Alan, the lack of support for 32bit UEFI is an engineering decision; the documentation must reflect the actual features of the software so we can't help with your concern.  There are very few 32bit UEFI systems though, so I don't think resources will be devoted to their support.
Comment 3 Pete Travis 2014-01-26 05:17:13 UTC 
commit f78136ee25f930debe2eaff852162c142b71deda
Author: Pete Travis <immanetize>
Date:   Sat Jan 25 21:57:24 2014 -0700

    Adding note on lack of 32bit UEFI support, BZ995128
Comment 4 Pete Travis 2014-06-27 22:59:19 UTC 
This is covered fairly well in the current release, closing.