Bug 1036055

Summary:	vzfs missing in hrStorage in an Virtuozzo Container
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Andreas Schnederle-Wagner <schnederle>
Component:	net-snmp	Assignee:	Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.8	CC:	dapospis, schnederle
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	989498	Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-06-02 13:02:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andreas Schnederle-Wagner 2013-11-29 09:52:09 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #989498 +++

Description of problem:
   On RHEL 5.8 with default net-snmp package I can't get hrStorage Data with SNMP. So no monitoring of diskspace with nagios/icinga/... is possible.
   It worked on older RHEL 4.x/5.x Version - but also not on the few latest Versions.
   I guess this Bug is related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861152

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
   net-snmp-5.3.2.2-20.el5

How reproducible:
Query on not working 5.8 Host:
   snmpwalk -v 2c -c public HOST hrStorage
Answer:
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.1 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.3 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.6 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.7 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.10 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory

Query on working 4.9 Host: 
   snmpwalk -v 2c -c public HOST hrStorage
Answer:
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.1 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.2 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.3 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.4 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.5 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.6 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk

Additional info:
   hrStorageFixedDisk is missing on current RHEL Versions

   Bug was introduced in RHEL 5.7

   [root@rialtools ~]# df -h
   Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
   /dev/vzfs              50G   15G   36G  30% /
   none                  1.0G  4.0K  1.0G   1% /dev

--- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2013-11-21 17:50:44 EST ---

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1693.html

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-02-25 00:11:16 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2014-03-07 12:14:24 UTC

Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in the  last planned RHEL5 minor release. This Bugzilla will soon be CLOSED as WONTFIX. To request that Red Hat re-consider this request, please re-open the bugzilla via  appropriate support channels and provide additional business and/or technical details about its importance to you.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2014-06-02 13:02:40 UTC

Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in RHEL5 stream. If the issue is critical for your business, please provide additional business justification through the appropriate support channels (https://access.redhat.com/site/support).

Comment 4 Andreas Schnederle-Wagner 2014-09-25 14:06:41 UTC

Could easily be backported from RHEL 6 - as it got fixed there on my request - just 2-3 Lines of Code ...
Problem affects dozens of Server in our Company - and surely much more in other Companies ...
Maybe you reevaluate this Ticket.