Bug 989498 – vzfs missing in hrStorage in an Virtuozzo Container

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 989498 - vzfs missing in hrStorage in an Virtuozzo Container

Summary:	vzfs missing in hrStorage in an Virtuozzo Container

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	net-snmp (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.4
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jan Safranek
QA Contact:	Dalibor Pospíšil
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-07-29 07:42 EDT by Andreas Schnederle-Wagner
Modified:	2013-11-21 17:50 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	In the previous net-snmp updates, the implementation of “HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageTable” was rewritten and devices with Virtuozzo File System (VZFS) and BTRFS were not reported. In this update, snmpd properly recognizes VZFS and BTRFS devices and reports them in “HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageTable”.
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1036055 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-21 17:50:44 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla	861152	None	None	None	Never
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2013:1693	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	net-snmp bug fix and enhancement update	2013-11-20 16:52:17 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description Andreas Schnederle-Wagner 2013-07-29 07:42:55 EDT

Description of problem:
   On RHEL 6.x with default net-snmp package I can't get hrStorage Data with SNMP. So no monitoring of diskspace with nagios/icinga/... is possible.
   It worked on older RHEL 4.x/5.x Version - but also not on the few latest Versions.
   I guess this Bug is related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861152

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
   net-snmp-5.5-44.el6_4.2.x86_64

How reproducible:
Query on not working 6.4 Host:
   snmpwalk -v 2c -c public HOST hrStorage
Answer:
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.1 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.3 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.6 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.7 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.10 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory

Query on working 4.9 Host: 
   snmpwalk -v 2c -c public HOST hrStorage
Answer:
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.1 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageOther
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.2 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.3 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.4 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.5 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk
   HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.6 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageFixedDisk

Additional info:
   hrStorageFixedDisk is missing on current RHEL Versions

   Bug was introduced in RHEL 5.7

   [root@rialtools ~]# df -h
   Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
   /dev/vzfs              50G   15G   36G  30% /
   none                  1.0G  4.0K  1.0G   1% /dev

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 17:50:44 EST

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1693.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.