Bug 105740

Summary: I dont want to use gconf-editor to use a custom https browser.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dams <anvil>
Component: control-centerAssignee: Jonathan Blandford <jrb>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: anvil, ddumas, louisgtwo
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-09-29 16:05:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 100644    

Description Dams 2003-09-26 21:11:08 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703
Galeon/1.3.9

Description of problem:
running gnome-default-applications-properties allow you to choose a custom http
browser but this doesnt change the /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https/* gconf
settings.
I see two solutions :
1/ gnome-default-applications-properties "Web Browser" tab set both http and
https settings. 
2/ someone add a "Secure web browser" (whatever) tab to
gnome-default-applications-properties. 

Maybe you/someone/whoever-want-to-do-it could put a 'use same/different settings
for https' checkbox in the 'Web Browser' tab (1/) or the "Secure Web Browser"
tab (2/).

I was really surprised to see mozilla instead of galeon2 when i clicked on a
bugzilla https link in evolution :)
It can and will surprise a lot of users.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
control-center(1:2.4.0-1).i386

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gnome-default-applications-properties &

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jonathan Blandford 2003-09-29 16:05:40 UTC
Filed upstream as:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123487

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-09 05:21:40 UTC
*** Bug 106655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***