Bug 107121

Summary: rhgb doesn't display fsck output
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component: rhgbAssignee: Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jspaleta, mitr, oliva
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-15 17:41:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 132665    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jens Petersen 2003-10-15 07:47:52 UTC
Description of problem:
After every N boots, fsck.ext3 gets run at startup.  In this case rhgb doesn't
give any indication of what is going on on either the undetailed or detailed
screens.  Since running fsck is rather time-consuming these days, some kind
of visual feedback for this would be very nice to have.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhgb-0.10.2-1

Comment 1 Nils O. SelÄsdal 2004-05-03 11:28:52 UTC
I was just about to report this as well.
It's rather nasty cause the machine appears hung, no feed back
on anything(except HD flashlight is on). rhgb just shows nothing,
and after a couple of reboots I realized switching (ctrl+alt+f1) might
help, and there it was, doing a fsck..

Comment 2 Alexandre Oliva 2004-09-06 14:59:35 UTC
Unfortunately (bug 131899) Ctrl-Alt-F1 doesn't work any more.

Comment 3 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-15 17:41:04 UTC
Ctrl-Alt-F1 should be fixed on rhgb-0.13.1-1
it also should fix this issue assuming the patch from #132665
is also applied. In which case the fsck progresses and results
are shown in the rhgb detailed view.
Anyway rhgb-0.13.1-1 is being pushed to rawhide and should fix this
issue.

Daniel

Comment 4 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-15 17:47:40 UTC
*** Bug 129881 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***