Bug 117943

Summary: Printer names shown by mac OS/X are unhelpful
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie>
Component: system-config-printerAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: aleksey, ian, james, mattwilkens, michal, mstyne, pcfe
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.6.130-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-11 12:19:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Christine Caulfield 2004-03-10 09:45:14 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040217

Description of problem:
The Info field for all printers created by print manager is
"Created by redhat-config-printer 0.6.x".
                                                                     
          
This is less than helpful when viewing shared printers on a Mac
running OS/X as that seems to be the field it chooses to display ! 

Is there any chance of making the Info field more desciptive of the
printer ?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a printer
2. Browse for printers using a Mac running OS/X
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2004-03-10 09:46:31 UTC
Maybe we could keep a separate list of queue names that have been
deleted -- that would get rid of the need for this special field.

Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2004-04-06 16:53:09 UTC
*** Bug 120180 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2004-05-24 11:22:10 UTC
*** Bug 124015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2004-11-16 14:00:45 UTC
*** Bug 139189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2005-05-10 17:09:40 UTC
This *should* be addressed in 0.6.130-1 in rawhide.