Bug 1181108
Summary: | [RFE] While creating a snapshot the timestamp has to be appended to the snapshot name. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Darshan <dnarayan> | |
Component: | snapshot | Assignee: | Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | rhgs-3.0 | CC: | annair, asengupt, asrivast, bmohanra, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, rjoseph, rkavunga, senaik, storage-qa-internal, vagarwal | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | |
Target Release: | RHGS 3.1.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.7.0-3.el6rhs.x86_64 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
When a snapshot is created, the current time-stamp in GMT is appended to its name. Due to this, the same snapshot name can be used by multiple snapshots.
If a user does not want to append the timestamp with the snapshot name, the "no-timestamp" option in the snapshot create command can be used.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1189473 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-07-29 04:37:52 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1189473, 1202842, 1311043 |
Description
Darshan
2015-01-12 11:45:56 UTC
Fixed with http://review.gluster.org/9597 and http://review.gluster.org/9861 Version : glusterfs-3.7.1-1.el6rhs.x86_64 ======= Snapshot is created with timestamp appended to the snapshot name : gluster snapshot create S1 vol0 snapshot create: success: Snap S1_GMT-2015.06.12-05.40.37 created successfully Hi Rajesh, The doc text is updated. Please review the same and share your technical review comments. If it looks ok, then sign-off on the same. Regards, Bhavana Looks good to me. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1495.html |