Bug 1226233

Summary:	Mount broker user add command removes existing volume for a mountbroker user when second volume is attached to same user
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Aravinda VK <avishwan>
Component:	geo-replication	Assignee:	Aravinda VK <avishwan>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.7.0	CC:	avishwan, bugs, dnarayan, gluster-bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1226223	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-06-25 06:03:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1226223, 1234869, 1235428
Bug Blocks:	1233025

Description Aravinda VK 2015-05-29 09:27:33 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1226223 +++

Description of problem:
Mount broker user add command(gluster system:: execute mountbroker user geoaccount slavevol) removes existing volume for a mountbroker user when second volume is attached to the same mount broker user.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Add a volume to a mount broker user using the above mentioned command.
2.Add another volume to same mount broker user using command.
3.

Actual results:
The volume added first is removed from the volfile

Expected results:
The volume added second must be appended to the existing list of volumes for a mount broker user.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Niels de Vos 2015-06-02 08:20:23 UTC

The required changes to fix this bug have not made it into glusterfs-3.7.1. This bug is now getting tracked for glusterfs-3.7.2.

Comment 2 Niels de Vos 2015-06-20 10:08:50 UTC

Unfortunately glusterfs-3.7.2 did not contain a code change that was associated with this bug report. This bug is now proposed to be a blocker for glusterfs-3.7.3.

Comment 3 Darshan 2015-06-25 06:03:37 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1235428 ***