Bug 1280005

Summary:	RFE: EQL: Update tripleo-heat-template to support multiple EQL arrays
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Rajini Karthik <rajini.karthik>
Component:	rhosp-director	Assignee:	Angus Thomas <athomas>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	yeylon <yeylon>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0 (Liberty)	CC:	arkady_kanevsky, cdevine, christopher_dearborn, John_walsh, kbader, kurt_hey, mburns, morazi, rajini.karthik, randy_perryman, rhel-osp-director-maint, rsussman, sreichar, srevivo, wayne_allen, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, OtherQA, Triaged
Target Release:	8.0 (Liberty)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1266219	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-03-04 14:56:51 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1266219
Bug Blocks:	1261979, 1266220

Description Rajini Karthik 2015-11-10 17:16:14 UTC

Description of problem:
The cinder backend should support mutiple sections of EQL arrays

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Mike Orazi 2016-02-17 19:35:33 UTC

Is this different than:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269990 ?

Comment 5 arkady kanevsky 2016-02-18 04:32:23 UTC

Yes they are different.
This one is to support multiple EQL arrays for a single deployment.
The https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269990 is for support multiple different backends (EQL, CMPL, Ceph, NFS) for a single deployment.
Two are orthogonal. In reality we want support for heterogeneous back ends and with multiple instances of arrays of some types, like EQL. 
Do not know if we have the requirement for multiple CMPL or multiple Cephs in a single deployment. Till we know, only requesting multiple EQL support.
By the way this is supported functionality for JS-3x and 4x.

Providing answer for Rajini's request

Comment 6 arkady kanevsky 2016-02-18 04:32:35 UTC

Yes they are different.
This one is to support multiple EQL arrays for a single deployment.
The https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269990 is for support multiple different backends (EQL, CMPL, Ceph, NFS) for a single deployment.
Two are orthogonal. In reality we want support for heterogeneous back ends and with multiple instances of arrays of some types, like EQL. 
Do not know if we have the requirement for multiple CMPL or multiple Cephs in a single deployment. Till we know, only requesting multiple EQL support.
By the way this is supported functionality for JS-3x and 4x.

Providing answer for Rajini's request

Comment 7 Kyle Bader 2016-02-18 04:36:08 UTC

We probably do want to support multiple cinder backends for Ceph as well, so customers can have different Volume Types associated with pools that take root at branch of a CRUSH hierarchy (eg. Spinning, Dense SSD, Fast SSD). Should I open another RFE?

Comment 8 Mike Burns 2016-03-04 14:56:51 UTC

Bug 1269990 is a generic "support multiple instances of any backend type".  The fix there will resolve this bug as well.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1269990 ***