Bug 1296146

Summary: [RFE] specify the AMQP server IP address for Openstack providers
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Marius Cornea <mcornea>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Julian Cheal <jcheal>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Marius Cornea <mcornea>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.5.0CC: asimonel, carnott, cpelland, fdewaley, gblomqui, jfrey, jhardy, jocarter, jprause, obarenbo, tshefi
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 5.6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: openstack
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1310114 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-08 14:09:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1326509    

Description Marius Cornea 2016-01-06 13:08:18 UTC
Description of problem:
We're not able to specify the AMQP server IP address for Openstack providers. When deploying an undercloud with SSL enabled the Keystone endpoints are set on a different IP address than the one RabbitMQ uses to bind. Thus the RabbitMQ server can't be reached from Cloudforms side.

Comment 3 Tzach Shefi 2016-02-04 13:13:09 UTC
Also need to support Staypuft installed Openstack, in my case an old Juno HA deployment, Rabbit is running at port 35672. 

I've installed it a while back, don't remember (or think) I had done any custom rabbit port settings. Other than port issue, Rabbit only listens on internal staypuft IP's  (192.168.0.X) this is another problem not related, probably  could be fixed on Staypuft installer's side. 

Tested with CFME 5.5.2.4.20160127105142_395c086

Comment 4 Greg Blomquist 2016-02-18 21:35:39 UTC
Julian, this is dependent on the multi-endpoint work you're working on.

Comment 5 Greg Blomquist 2016-02-19 21:39:48 UTC
*** Bug 1255324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Greg Blomquist 2016-02-19 22:59:00 UTC
*** Bug 1103965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***