Bug 133057

Summary:	Source URL invalid
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Moritz Barsnick <moritz>
Component:	zlib	Assignee:	Jeff Johnson <jbj>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-21 13:24:05 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Moritz Barsnick 2004-09-21 09:43:17 UTC

Description of problem:
The given source URL ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/zlib/zlib-%
{version}.tar.gz has been invalid for quite some time.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.2.1.2-1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. read "Source:" tag in zlib.spec file
2. go to ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/zlib/
  
Actual results:
No current source available.

Expected results:
Find source.

Additional info:
I was trying to find the original location of zlib-1.2.1.x. In the 
official location (which is now actually http://www.gzip.org/zlib/
zlib-%{version}.tar.bz2), the newer sources 1.2.1.1 and 1.2.1.2 are 
not available. Where the he** did you ever get them from??? Debian's 
system also won't show me their original source location.

Comment 1 Moritz Barsnick 2004-09-21 09:45:53 UTC

*** Bug 133056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jeff Johnson 2004-09-21 13:24:05 UTC

zlib-1.2.1.2 was announced on the zlib-devel mailing list.

the uri will perhaps be corrected in some future build; all recent
builds have come from sources announced on zlib-devel.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2004-09-22 07:34:35 UTC

Moritz, I think the tarball of 1.2.1.x is created from CVS branches 
(based on the zlib-devel list) or so...but at least you're right, 
the source path in the spec files doesn't exist.