Bug 1374117

Summary:	Dell SC: Add secondary DSM support
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Rajini Karthik <rajini.karthik>
Component:	openstack-cinder	Assignee:	Mike Burns <mburns>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	lkuchlan <lkuchlan>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	9.0 (Mitaka)	CC:	arkady_kanevsky, cdevine, christopher_dearborn, david_paterson, dcain, egafford, eharney, jjoyce, John_walsh, jschluet, kasmith, kurt_hey, mburns, morazi, nlevinki, rajini.karthik, randy_perryman, smerrow, sreichar, srevivo
Target Milestone:	ga	Keywords:	OtherQA, TestOnly, Triaged
Target Release:	10.0 (Newton)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	openstack-cinder-9.0.0-0.20160907194411.4057701.el7ost	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1373603	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-14 15:58:18 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1335593, 1356451

Description Rajini Karthik 2016-09-08 02:17:25 UTC

Description of problem:
Requesting a backport to mitaka
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338548/
Adds support for a secondary DSM in case the primary becomes
unavailable.

Added thin_provisioning_support = True to the volume stats since
the Dell driver only supports thin provisioning.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-08 02:44:51 UTC

*** Bug 1374118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Karl Hastings 2016-09-12 18:26:31 UTC

The upstream change has been merged into Newton.  Is there an update on getting this backported to RHOSP9 Mitaka?

Comment 3 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-13 15:52:31 UTC

Waiting on Tom Swanson to post the backport

Comment 4 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-19 16:00:36 UTC

#1 won’t be backported. It isn’t a bugfix. So it will be available in newton

Comment 5 Karl Hastings 2016-09-19 21:15:48 UTC

Rajini,

The rule-engine set this back to OSP9.  I'm going to set it back to 10 as you requested.

If this is in error, please let me know.

-Karl

Comment 6 Eric Harney 2016-09-20 19:01:24 UTC

This bug is targeted to OSP10/Newton, where this patch has already landed, but it's blocking the js6 / OSP9 tracker.

Can you clarify what this request is for?

Thanks,
Eric

Comment 7 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-20 19:08:38 UTC

Removed blocks.

Comment 10 Mike Burns 2016-12-05 15:49:30 UTC

Rajini,  Can this be verified with the OSP 10 RC available in CDN?

Comment 11 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-05 15:50:07 UTC

Yes, will do

Comment 12 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-12 19:56:15 UTC

Tested this on RH7-RHOS-10.0-RC-2016-11-30.9.repo.
Looks good.

Comment 13 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-12 19:57:06 UTC

Mike , this can be resolved. Thanks

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-14 15:58:18 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-2948.html