Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1374117

Summary: Dell SC: Add secondary DSM support
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Rajini Karthik <rajini.karthik>
Component: openstack-cinderAssignee: Mike Burns <mburns>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: lkuchlan <lkuchlan>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0 (Mitaka)CC: arkady_kanevsky, cdevine, christopher_dearborn, david_paterson, dcain, egafford, eharney, jjoyce, John_walsh, jschluet, kazen, kurt_hey, mburns, morazi, nlevinki, rajini.karthik, randy_perryman, smerrow, sreichar, srevivo
Target Milestone: gaKeywords: OtherQA, TestOnly, Triaged
Target Release: 10.0 (Newton)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-cinder-9.0.0-0.20160907194411.4057701.el7ost Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1373603 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-14 15:58:18 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1335593, 1356451    

Description Rajini Karthik 2016-09-08 02:17:25 UTC 
Description of problem:
Requesting a backport to mitaka
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338548/
Adds support for a secondary DSM in case the primary becomes
unavailable.

Added thin_provisioning_support = True to the volume stats since
the Dell driver only supports thin provisioning.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-08 02:44:51 UTC 
*** Bug 1374118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Karl Hastings 2016-09-12 18:26:31 UTC 
The upstream change has been merged into Newton.  Is there an update on getting this backported to RHOSP9 Mitaka?
Comment 3 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-13 15:52:31 UTC 
Waiting on Tom Swanson to post the backport
Comment 4 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-19 16:00:36 UTC 
#1 won’t be backported. It isn’t a bugfix. So it will be available in newton
Comment 5 Karl Hastings 2016-09-19 21:15:48 UTC 
Rajini,

The rule-engine set this back to OSP9.  I'm going to set it back to 10 as you requested.

If this is in error, please let me know.

-Karl
Comment 6 Eric Harney 2016-09-20 19:01:24 UTC 
This bug is targeted to OSP10/Newton, where this patch has already landed, but it's blocking the js6 / OSP9 tracker.

Can you clarify what this request is for?

Thanks,
Eric
Comment 7 Rajini Karthik 2016-09-20 19:08:38 UTC 
Removed blocks.
Comment 10 Mike Burns 2016-12-05 15:49:30 UTC 
Rajini,  Can this be verified with the OSP 10 RC available in CDN?
Comment 11 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-05 15:50:07 UTC 
Yes, will do
Comment 12 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-12 19:56:15 UTC 
Tested this on RH7-RHOS-10.0-RC-2016-11-30.9.repo.
Looks good.
Comment 13 Rajini Karthik 2016-12-12 19:57:06 UTC 
Mike , this can be resolved. Thanks
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-14 15:58:18 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-2948.html