Bug 1463505
| Summary: | DNF errors with "Assertion `ret == 0' failed." | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jiří Vymazal <jvymazal> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | cunio, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-21 07:45:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jiří Vymazal
2017-06-21 07:17:13 UTC
Also tried running "sudo dnf clean all" but it did not help. rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/* DNF 1.x is unsupported and will get only security fixes, so closing. Ok, just how am I supposed to "correctly" upgrade dnf to supported version (and by the way why is this not handled (semi-)automatically during dnf upgrade)? The work-around you listed above worked only for one dnf command after it and now no longer works at all. Tried also reboot and coupling your work-around with dnf clean all but nothing helps. *** Bug 1463582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1463580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Jiri, In ma case updates-testing repo caused the error. Disabling it helps: dnf --disabelrepo=updates-tetsing update Igor, there is no any other version of dnf than 1.x in any official fedora 25 repos. What should we use then? I think the bug should be be reopened with hight priority beacuse it blocks updating the system. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1463561 *** |