Bug 226511

Summary:	Merge Review: unifdef
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	jonathan.underwood, redhat-bugzilla, wtogami
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	wtogami: fedora-review+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-28 23:34:07 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 21:12:54 UTC

Fedora Merge Review: unifdef

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unifdef/
Initial Owner: dwmw2

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2007-02-01 19:07:27 UTC

APPROVED due to previous reviews in Bug #190362 and Bug #189937

(ASSIGNED to owner, deal with this only after the new buildsys is up)

Comment 2 Jonathan Underwood 2007-02-09 10:53:14 UTC

I wonder if you still think there's a need to include an unifdef package when
sunifdef is available currently in Extras (packaged by me) - sunifdef is
effectively upstream now, since unifdef hasn't been maintained for a while. 

"Sunifdef is a commandline tool for eliminating superfluous preprocessor clutter
from C and C++ source files. It is a more powerful successor to the FreeBSD
'unifdef' tool."

http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/

Comment 3 David Woodhouse 2007-02-09 11:18:17 UTC

No, I have no particular need for it since the kernel now includes its own copy
of unifdef; it doesn't use the external one any more.

Comment 4 Jonathan Underwood 2007-03-02 15:59:50 UTC

Well, since unifdef is largely unmaintained as far as I can tell, shall we drop
the package? Would you like to co-maintain sunifdef? :)

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 23:34:07 UTC

David, if you don't care about this package, please orphan it according to
the Fedora Guidelines. Anyway, the package already got reviewed when reading
bug #190362 and bug #189937. Warren set the flag for this review request,
too - closing now.