Bug 226511 - Merge Review: unifdef
Merge Review: unifdef
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Woodhouse
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 16:12 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2008-12-28 18:34 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-28 18:34:07 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wtogami: fedora‑review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 16:12:54 EST
Fedora Merge Review: unifdef

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unifdef/
Initial Owner: dwmw2@redhat.com
Comment 1 Warren Togami 2007-02-01 14:07:27 EST
APPROVED due to previous reviews in Bug #190362 and Bug #189937

(ASSIGNED to owner, deal with this only after the new buildsys is up)
Comment 2 Jonathan Underwood 2007-02-09 05:53:14 EST
I wonder if you still think there's a need to include an unifdef package when
sunifdef is available currently in Extras (packaged by me) - sunifdef is
effectively upstream now, since unifdef hasn't been maintained for a while. 

"Sunifdef is a commandline tool for eliminating superfluous preprocessor clutter
from C and C++ source files. It is a more powerful successor to the FreeBSD
'unifdef' tool."

http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/
Comment 3 David Woodhouse 2007-02-09 06:18:17 EST
No, I have no particular need for it since the kernel now includes its own copy
of unifdef; it doesn't use the external one any more.
Comment 4 Jonathan Underwood 2007-03-02 10:59:50 EST
Well, since unifdef is largely unmaintained as far as I can tell, shall we drop
the package? Would you like to co-maintain sunifdef? :)
Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 18:34:07 EST
David, if you don't care about this package, please orphan it according to
the Fedora Guidelines. Anyway, the package already got reviewed when reading
bug #190362 and bug #189937. Warren set the flag for this review request,
too - closing now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.