Bug 226511 – Merge Review: unifdef

Bug 226511 - Merge Review: unifdef

Summary:	Merge Review: unifdef

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	David Woodhouse
QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-01-31 16:12 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified:	2008-12-28 18:34 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-28 18:34:07 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Flags:	wtogami: fedora‑review+

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 16:12:54 EST

Fedora Merge Review: unifdef

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/unifdef/
Initial Owner: dwmw2@redhat.com

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2007-02-01 14:07:27 EST

APPROVED due to previous reviews in Bug #190362 and Bug #189937

(ASSIGNED to owner, deal with this only after the new buildsys is up)

Comment 2 Jonathan Underwood 2007-02-09 05:53:14 EST

I wonder if you still think there's a need to include an unifdef package when
sunifdef is available currently in Extras (packaged by me) - sunifdef is
effectively upstream now, since unifdef hasn't been maintained for a while. 

"Sunifdef is a commandline tool for eliminating superfluous preprocessor clutter
from C and C++ source files. It is a more powerful successor to the FreeBSD
'unifdef' tool."

http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/

Comment 3 David Woodhouse 2007-02-09 06:18:17 EST

No, I have no particular need for it since the kernel now includes its own copy
of unifdef; it doesn't use the external one any more.

Comment 4 Jonathan Underwood 2007-03-02 10:59:50 EST

Well, since unifdef is largely unmaintained as far as I can tell, shall we drop
the package? Would you like to co-maintain sunifdef? :)

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 18:34:07 EST

David, if you don't care about this package, please orphan it according to
the Fedora Guidelines. Anyway, the package already got reviewed when reading
bug #190362 and bug #189937. Warren set the flag for this review request,
too - closing now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.