Bug 237831

Summary: Wrong init script
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Michal Marciniszyn <mmarcini>
Component: isdn4k-utilsAssignee: Than Ngo <than>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.0CC: cmeadors, riek, syeghiay, tvujec
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-17 14:47:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 237789, 237832, 237833, 242493, 242495    

Description Michal Marciniszyn 2007-04-25 15:37:49 UTC 
Description of problem:
Through the script, following constructions are used:
[ -f /sbin/capiinit ] || exit 0
[ -f /etc/capi.conf ] || exit 0
Effectively, they return 0 even when the service is not started or running
(start/status command). Also wrong return codes are present through the script.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
all

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. remove capi.conf file
2. service capi start/status
3. echo $?
  
Actual results:
0

Expected results:
non-zero error code/correct service status

Additional info:
When fixing this bug, please obbey our init script guidelines and be sure that
status command is run correctly.
Our guidelines are on following two pages:
http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/InitscriptsSpec.html
http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/ic/intranet/InitscriptGuidelines.html

For an example of the script that returns the error codes correctly and always
runs status see:
http://devserv.devel.redhat.com/~mmarcini/amd

This bug is tracked by 237789.
Comment 1 Phil Knirsch 2008-04-29 15:32:25 UTC 
Proposing for RHEL-5.3, waiting with final ACK on developer review.

Read ya, Phil
Comment 2 Than Ngo 2008-05-28 15:04:35 UTC 
+devel ack
Comment 6 Than Ngo 2008-07-28 09:55:47 UTC 
*** Bug 242481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2009-06-17 14:47:54 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1112.html