Bug 239633

Summary: [hi_IN] [mr_IN] the glyph of 0x0953 in lohit_hi.ttf is wrong.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yu Shao <yshao>
Component: lohit-fontsAssignee: Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 9CC: i18n-bugs, petersen
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-10 12:18:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 239630    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Liang Zhang 2007-05-10 02:03:36 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #239630 +++

Description of problem:
The glyph of 0x0953 in lohit_hi.ttf is wrong. It is different with the glyph of
0x0953 in Unicode 5.0

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fonts-indic-2.1.5

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
The below wrong image

Expected results:
The below right image

Additional info:

-- Additional comment from lizhang on 2007-05-09 22:00 EST --
Created an attachment (id=154446)
the wrong glyph of 0x0953 in our font file


-- Additional comment from lizhang on 2007-05-09 22:01 EST --
Created an attachment (id=154447)
the right glyph of 0x0953 in Unicode 5.0
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2007-05-23 09:40:24 UTC 
LingNing, in the future better to clone a fedora bug to rhel not
the other way round.
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2007-10-23 04:36:54 UTC 
*** Bug 281781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 02:53:13 UTC 
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 5 Tony Fu 2008-09-10 03:10:07 UTC 
requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)
Comment 6 Rahul Bhalerao 2008-09-10 12:18:52 UTC 
Was fixed in lohit-fonts-hindi-2.2.0-1.