Bug 239842

Summary: /lib/lsb/init-functions shall use aliases but not functions
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla>
Component: redhat-lsbAssignee: Lawrence Lim <llim>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: desktop-bugs, kb6ql, mspevack, tools-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-17 07:09:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 239684    

Description Enrico Scholz 2007-05-11 17:35:48 UTC 
Description of problem:

/lib/lsb/init-functions in FC7 uses functions to implement the 'pidofproc'
functions. This breaks common use cases like

| pids=$(pidofproc foo)

Such constructs work fine in FC6.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

redhat-lsb-3.1-13


How reproducible:

100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. . /lib/lsb/init-functions
2. echo $(pidofproc bash)

  
Actual results:

FC7 fails with 'bash: pidofproc: command not found'


Expected results:

FC6 gives out list of bash-processes
Comment 1 Eric Harney 2007-05-21 14:54:08 UTC 
I think the real problem here is that somebody typo'd the pidofproc function and
renamed it "pidofprof" in /lib/lsb/init-functions.
Comment 2 Enrico Scholz 2007-07-07 08:37:11 UTC 
*** Bug 247290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Max Spevack 2007-07-09 19:39:24 UTC 
It should be a trivial fix then, right?
Comment 4 Lawrence Lim 2007-07-18 07:09:37 UTC 
Waiting for ACL to be updated so that the patch can be committed.
Comment 5 Lawrence Lim 2007-07-20 02:10:22 UTC 
should be fix in redhat-lsb-3_1-15_f8.
Comment 6 A S Alam 2007-12-17 07:09:34 UTC 
it Fixed in following version:
--
redhat-lsb-3_1-19.fc8
Comment 7 Enrico Scholz 2008-02-12 20:07:41 UTC 
*** Bug 432548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***