Bug 250873

Summary:	Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	perl-MLDBM	Assignee:	Steven Pritchard <steve>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dennis, kevin, perl-devel
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-12-03 14:52:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	250872
Bug Blocks:	250862

Description Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 23:19:08 UTC

Description of problem:
Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-MLDBM-2.01-5

Actual results:
No perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-BerkeleyDB dependency.

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
there.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2007-08-06 21:40:04 UTC

Rebuilding in mock at EPEL 5 succeeded and looks fine:

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5.noarch.rpm

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2007-08-13 21:56:55 UTC

Ping?

Comment 3 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-07 09:14:55 UTC

*** Bug 305721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-07 09:20:11 UTC

I think for new branch is review needed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and I didn't
find any review of this package.

Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-16 10:55:49 UTC

CVS request is missing, so here it is:

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-MLDBM
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2007-11-16 11:16:00 UTC

Well, I'm still waiting for Jose. If he doesn't care about the package at all, 
I would take it - or just the EPEL branches. If he cares about the package, I 
will be just quiet. Thus I put no branch request into.

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-16 17:08:01 UTC

I am pretty sure Jose is no longer interested in fedora. 

Robert: Let me know if you would like to wait a bit more, or would like me to
just go ahead and make those branches for you now.

Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-28 18:15:22 UTC

jpo has been marked as AWOL. Please see: 

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-November/msg02343.html

for more info.

Comment 9 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-28 22:10:02 UTC

So someone has already built this, and we can close the ticket, correct?

Comment 10 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-28 23:03:48 UTC

I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. 

I don't see any build yet for epel-4.

Comment 11 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-29 01:40:09 UTC

(In reply to comment #10)
> I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. 
> 
> I don't see any build yet for epel-4. 

Weird.  I don't know what I thought I saw.  I've updated the spec to match the
devel branch and fired off EL-4 and EL-5 builds.

Comment 12 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-29 18:42:19 UTC

OK, it is definitely in testing now.

Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-29 19:57:30 UTC

Clearing the cvs flag here as no cvsadmin attention seems needed.