Bug 250873 - Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-MLDBM (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Steven Pritchard
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: 305721 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 250872
Blocks: 250862
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-08-03 19:19 EDT by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2007-12-03 09:52 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-12-03 09:52:09 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Robert Scheck 2007-08-03 19:19:08 EDT
Description of problem:
Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Actual results:
No perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5

Expected results:
Package perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-BerkeleyDB dependency.

Additional info:
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package 
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2007-08-06 17:40:04 EDT
Rebuilding in mock at EPEL 5 succeeded and looks fine:

Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5.noarch.rpm
Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2007-08-13 17:56:55 EDT
Comment 3 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-07 04:14:55 EST
*** Bug 305721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-07 04:20:11 EST
I think for new branch is review needed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and I didn't
find any review of this package.
Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-11-16 05:55:49 EST
CVS request is missing, so here it is:

Package Change Request
Package Name: perl-MLDBM
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2007-11-16 06:16:00 EST
Well, I'm still waiting for Jose. If he doesn't care about the package at all, 
I would take it - or just the EPEL branches. If he cares about the package, I 
will be just quiet. Thus I put no branch request into.
Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-16 12:08:01 EST
I am pretty sure Jose is no longer interested in fedora. 

Robert: Let me know if you would like to wait a bit more, or would like me to
just go ahead and make those branches for you now. 
Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-28 13:15:22 EST
jpo has been marked as AWOL. Please see: 


for more info. 
Comment 9 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-28 17:10:02 EST
So someone has already built this, and we can close the ticket, correct?
Comment 10 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-28 18:03:48 EST
I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. 

I don't see any build yet for epel-4. 
Comment 11 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-28 20:40:09 EST
(In reply to comment #10)
> I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th. 
> I don't see any build yet for epel-4. 

Weird.  I don't know what I thought I saw.  I've updated the spec to match the
devel branch and fired off EL-4 and EL-5 builds.
Comment 12 Steven Pritchard 2007-11-29 13:42:19 EST
OK, it is definitely in testing now.
Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-29 14:57:30 EST
Clearing the cvs flag here as no cvsadmin attention seems needed. 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.