Description of problem:
Please rebuild perl-MLDBM for EPEL 4 and 5
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
No perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5
Package perl-MLDBM in EPEL 4 and 5, because it's a perl-BerkeleyDB dependency.
Please let me know, when you're not interested in maintaining the package
Rebuilding in mock at EPEL 5 succeeded and looks fine:
*** Bug 305721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I think for new branch is review needed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and I didn't
find any review of this package.
CVS request is missing, so here it is:
Package Change Request
Package Name: perl-MLDBM
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Well, I'm still waiting for Jose. If he doesn't care about the package at all,
I would take it - or just the EPEL branches. If he cares about the package, I
will be just quiet. Thus I put no branch request into.
I am pretty sure Jose is no longer interested in fedora.
Robert: Let me know if you would like to wait a bit more, or would like me to
just go ahead and make those branches for you now.
jpo has been marked as AWOL. Please see:
for more info.
So someone has already built this, and we can close the ticket, correct?
I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th.
I don't see any build yet for epel-4.
(In reply to comment #10)
> I see perl-MLDBM-2.01-5.el5 in the epel-5 testing repo, built on Nov 17th.
> I don't see any build yet for epel-4.
Weird. I don't know what I thought I saw. I've updated the spec to match the
devel branch and fired off EL-4 and EL-5 builds.
OK, it is definitely in testing now.
Clearing the cvs flag here as no cvsadmin attention seems needed.