Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Tracker: fonts in fonts-* should be moved to own packages|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jens Petersen <petersen>|
|Component:||distribution||Assignee:||Jens Petersen <petersen>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||dcantrell, eng-i18n-bugs, fonts-bugs, rvokal|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-10-22 22:27:15 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:||253149, 253155, 253158, 253161, 315071, 315081, 315091|
Description Jens Petersen 2007-08-23 01:38:20 EDT
This bug is to track renaming (moving) of fonts in the generically named fonts-* packages to their own packages named after their upstream projects.
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2007-10-01 03:42:02 EDT
Leaving this open since I think we need to rename fonts-hebrew, fonts-arabic, and maybe some others too.
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2007-10-02 03:27:17 EDT
added them now
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2007-10-18 01:15:39 EDT
Apart from some of the older bitmap fonts (like for ISO-8859-* and KOI8 say) I can't think of any other fonts packages that need renaming.
Comment 4 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-10-22 00:45:13 EDT
So, do new packages Provide: fonts-arabic and the like?
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2007-10-22 00:59:50 EDT
No, because currently the old fonts-* packages are still there as meta-packages which require the new packages, but we may rethink that for F9.
Comment 6 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-10-22 16:43:34 EDT
Fair enough. That may actually be a better solution.
Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2007-10-22 22:27:15 EDT
Closing this since it seems to have been basically achieved for F8. :)