Bug 379491

Summary: anaconda: Error running transaction when select all optional packages of all components
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Yan Tian <tyan>
Component: distributionAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: desktop-bugs, katzj, notting, rdieter, tjanouse
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Desktop
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-13 18:15:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 222486, 222506    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot.png
none
anaconda.log none

Description Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:03:32 UTC 
Description of problem:
During installation of F8 GA, anaconda show 'Error running transation' when
customizing packages and selecting all optional packages of all components.
Please read the attachment 'anaconda.log' for more details.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-11.3.0.50-2

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Customize packages
2. Select all optional packages for all components
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
If not select all optional packages of 'System Toos' and 'Mail Server'
components, but only select these 2 compoments to install default packages,
installation will proceed successfully.
Comment 1 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:03:33 UTC 
Created attachment 256471 [details]
Screenshot.png
Comment 2 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:04:22 UTC 
Created attachment 256481 [details]
anaconda.log
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2007-11-13 13:47:37 UTC 
We really shouldn't be shipping conflicting packages visible on the Fedora DVD.
 There's just no way to really give people a sane UI around it.

Although in this specific case, the right answer might be to not be
conflicting... they didn't in the past and I'm not sure why that changed back.
Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2007-11-13 18:15:48 UTC 
Yes, this is a bug in the packages.  Conflicts are not allowed in Fedora.  This
isn't something to fix at the compose level, there just shouldn't be conflicting
packages.  Period.