Bug 379491 - anaconda: Error running transaction when select all optional packages of all components
Summary: anaconda: Error running transaction when select all optional packages of all ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution
Version: 8
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 222486 222506
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-11-13 08:03 UTC by Yan Tian
Modified: 2013-01-10 01:43 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-13 18:15:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot.png (36.33 KB, image/png)
2007-11-13 08:03 UTC, Yan Tian
no flags Details
anaconda.log (28.23 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-13 08:04 UTC, Yan Tian
no flags Details

Description Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:03:32 UTC
Description of problem:
During installation of F8 GA, anaconda show 'Error running transation' when
customizing packages and selecting all optional packages of all components.
Please read the attachment 'anaconda.log' for more details.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-11.3.0.50-2

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Customize packages
2. Select all optional packages for all components
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
If not select all optional packages of 'System Toos' and 'Mail Server'
components, but only select these 2 compoments to install default packages,
installation will proceed successfully.

Comment 1 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:03:33 UTC
Created attachment 256471 [details]
Screenshot.png

Comment 2 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 08:04:22 UTC
Created attachment 256481 [details]
anaconda.log

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2007-11-13 13:47:37 UTC
We really shouldn't be shipping conflicting packages visible on the Fedora DVD.
 There's just no way to really give people a sane UI around it.

Although in this specific case, the right answer might be to not be
conflicting... they didn't in the past and I'm not sure why that changed back.

Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2007-11-13 18:15:48 UTC
Yes, this is a bug in the packages.  Conflicts are not allowed in Fedora.  This
isn't something to fix at the compose level, there just shouldn't be conflicting
packages.  Period.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.