Bug 379491 - anaconda: Error running transaction when select all optional packages of all components
anaconda: Error running transaction when select all optional packages of all ...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Cantrell
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: Desktop
Depends On: 222486 222506
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-11-13 03:03 EST by Yan Tian
Modified: 2013-01-09 20:43 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-11-13 13:15:48 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot.png (36.33 KB, image/png)
2007-11-13 03:03 EST, Yan Tian
no flags Details
anaconda.log (28.23 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-13 03:04 EST, Yan Tian
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Yan Tian 2007-11-13 03:03:32 EST
Description of problem:
During installation of F8 GA, anaconda show 'Error running transation' when
customizing packages and selecting all optional packages of all components.
Please read the attachment 'anaconda.log' for more details.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Customize packages
2. Select all optional packages for all components
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
If not select all optional packages of 'System Toos' and 'Mail Server'
components, but only select these 2 compoments to install default packages,
installation will proceed successfully.
Comment 1 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 03:03:33 EST
Created attachment 256471 [details]
Comment 2 Yan Tian 2007-11-13 03:04:22 EST
Created attachment 256481 [details]
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2007-11-13 08:47:37 EST
We really shouldn't be shipping conflicting packages visible on the Fedora DVD.
 There's just no way to really give people a sane UI around it.

Although in this specific case, the right answer might be to not be
conflicting... they didn't in the past and I'm not sure why that changed back.
Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2007-11-13 13:15:48 EST
Yes, this is a bug in the packages.  Conflicts are not allowed in Fedora.  This
isn't something to fix at the compose level, there just shouldn't be conflicting
packages.  Period.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.