Bug 442146

Summary: '/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime' should be owned by fedora-logos
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: petrosyan
Component: fedora-logosAssignee: David Zeuthen <davidz>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: mclasen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-06 04:06:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
maybe fedora-logos was an old package ? none

Description petrosyan 2008-04-12 01:59:08 UTC
Description of problem:
'/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime' and '/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot' folders should
be owned by fedora-logos package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9

Steps to Reproduce:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/*
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot is not owned by any package
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch

Comment 1 petrosyan 2008-04-12 02:13:32 UTC
'/usr/share/anaconda' and '/usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps' folders should also be
owned by fedora-logos package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda
file /usr/share/anaconda is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps
file /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps/*
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch

Comment 2 John Poelstra 2008-04-14 22:56:07 UTC
it appears that Fedora 8 has the same behavior.

Comment 3 David Timms 2008-05-04 02:24:39 UTC
Created attachment 304474 [details]
maybe fedora-logos was an old package ?

Thought it may have been due to an f8-rawhide upgrade, however:

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop
fedora-logos-9.0.0-2.fc9.noarch
fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch

# yum remove fedora-screensaver-theme
...
 Package		 Arch	    Version	     Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Removing:
 fedora-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      installed	  18 k
Removing for dependencies:
 fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      installed       
 102 k
 gnome-screensaver	 i386	    2.22.1-1.fc9     installed	       3.3 M

# yum install gnome-screensaver
...
 Package		 Arch	    Version	     Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Installing:
 gnome-screensaver	 i386	    2.22.1-1.fc9     rawhide	       1.8 M
Installing for dependencies:
 fedora-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      rawhide		 9.6 k
 fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      rawhide	       
  83 k

# rpm -qf /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop
fedora-logos-9.0.0-2.fc9.noarch
fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch

Comment 4 David Timms 2008-05-04 02:49:51 UTC
Uhh, strike that I meant to post into bug 333241.

Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2008-05-06 04:06:14 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 169282 ***