Bug 442146 - '/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime' should be owned by fedora-logos
Summary: '/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime' should be owned by fedora-logos
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 169282
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: fedora-logos
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Zeuthen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-12 01:59 UTC by petrosyan
Modified: 2013-03-06 03:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-06 04:06:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
maybe fedora-logos was an old package ? (9.76 KB, text/plain)
2008-05-04 02:24 UTC, David Timms 		no flags Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All

Description petrosyan 2008-04-12 01:59:08 UTC 
Description of problem:
'/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime' and '/usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot' folders should
be owned by fedora-logos package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9

Steps to Reproduce:
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/*
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*
file /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot is not owned by any package
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
Comment 1 petrosyan 2008-04-12 02:13:32 UTC 
'/usr/share/anaconda' and '/usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps' folders should also be
owned by fedora-logos package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda
file /usr/share/anaconda is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps
file /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps is not owned by any package

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/anaconda/pixmaps/*
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
fedora-logos-8.99.2-1.fc9.noarch
Comment 2 John Poelstra 2008-04-14 22:56:07 UTC 
it appears that Fedora 8 has the same behavior.
Comment 3 David Timms 2008-05-04 02:24:39 UTC 
Created attachment 304474 [details]
maybe fedora-logos was an old package ?

Thought it may have been due to an f8-rawhide upgrade, however:

$ rpm -qf /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop
fedora-logos-9.0.0-2.fc9.noarch
fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch

# yum remove fedora-screensaver-theme
...
 Package		 Arch	    Version	     Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Removing:
 fedora-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      installed	  18 k
Removing for dependencies:
 fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      installed       
 102 k
 gnome-screensaver	 i386	    2.22.1-1.fc9     installed	       3.3 M

# yum install gnome-screensaver
...
 Package		 Arch	    Version	     Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Installing:
 gnome-screensaver	 i386	    2.22.1-1.fc9     rawhide	       1.8 M
Installing for dependencies:
 fedora-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      rawhide		 9.6 k
 fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme  noarch     1.0.0-1.fc8      rawhide	       
  83 k

# rpm -qf /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop
fedora-logos-9.0.0-2.fc9.noarch
fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch
Comment 4 David Timms 2008-05-04 02:49:51 UTC 
Uhh, strike that I meant to post into bug 333241.
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2008-05-06 04:06:14 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 169282 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.