Bug 443015
| Summary: | rpm-find-requires prints no dependencies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> | ||||
| Component: | redhat-rpm-config | Assignee: | Jon Masters <jonathan> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jonathan, kevin, pmatilai, pnasrat, redhat-bugzilla | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-2.fc10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2008-08-11 07:34:14 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 235706, 438943, 443114, 443118 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Richard W.M. Jones
2008-04-18 07:21:12 UTC
Created attachment 302902 [details]
patch!
An earlier patch (436770) broke this. Try the attached.
Alternatively, your package's find-requires call could call /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires... I could change the base OCaml package to call /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires instead of /usr/lib/rpm/rpm-find-requires. I would like to understand what the difference is between these two scripts though. Your patch in comment 2 works for me however! $ echo /bin/ls | /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires libacl.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) librt.so.1 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2) libselinux.so.1 and with rpmbuild on an OCaml package: $ rpm -q --requires -p /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/virt-ctrl-1.0.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 libatk-1.0.so.0 libcairo.so.2 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libvirt.so.0 The difference is that /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires doesn't have the offending line... In any case, building as 4.4.2.3-2.fc9. Applied upstream. Thanks for the patch. Verified, builds are correct now. It looks like there's still (or "again"?) some variant of this bug in F10 Rawhide, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450271 The offending xchat build was built on May 22: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=50211 The F9 build from the same specfile has working deps. xchat uses %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 because it has to filter autoprovides, this may be relevant. xchat-2.8.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm, which I just built, still exhibits this bug. :-( Ping? xchat-2.8.6-2.fc10 is still missing its dependencies. This makes xchat not start on a default installation, because it ends up installed without libntlm. The dependency-eating bug ended up in redhat-rpm-config too... *** Bug 458527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Fixed in redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-2.fc10 (too) |