Bug 508951 (rhplectomy)

Summary: rhpl needs to die
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Component: rhplAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: dgregor, herrold, msivak, rrakus, tcallawa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-11 21:22:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 508946, 508947, 508948, 508968, 508974, 508975, 508984, 508988, 508991, 509424, 509913, 512205, 513617, 513981    
Bug Blocks: 443494, 473302    

Description Jeremy Katz 2009-06-30 15:58:32 UTC 
rhpl is now just a mis-mash and needs to die.  Tracking bug for changes to packages depending on rhpl
Comment 1 Roman Rakus 2009-07-16 15:16:11 UTC 
Is there substitution for all functionality? I'm interested in rhpl.executil (for now).
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2009-07-16 15:24:29 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is there substitution for all functionality? I'm interested in rhpl.executil
> (for now).  

Chris has a new module almost ready to replace rhpl.executil.  And the advantage is that it's going to also gain the bugzilla filing stuff we use in anaconda
Comment 3 Chris Lumens 2009-07-16 15:27:15 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is there substitution for all functionality? I'm interested in rhpl.executil
> (for now).  

In anaconda, we've replaced using rhpl.executil with calls to python's subprocess module.  That gives us everything we need, though if you're doing something rather complicated it might take a bit of coding.
Comment 5 Chris Lumens 2009-11-11 21:22:56 UTC 
rhpl is now an orphan.