Bug 523018
| Summary: | gnustep-make-2.2.0 is available | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring> | ||||||
| Component: | gnustep-make | Assignee: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | Axel.Thimm, jochen, tjarls | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | 2.2.0-3.fc10 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||||
| : | 517550 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-09-24 05:21:57 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Upstream Release Monitoring
2009-09-13 10:50:46 UTC
*** Bug 488534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 360847 [details] Updated spec file This is an updated spec that, among others, bring it up to 2.2.0 - As mentioned in the obsoleted bug report for 2.0.8, overriding the documentation directory does not make much sense, as all other GNUstep packages will try to install their documentation there. In this case we ought to just deviate from the normal FHS guidelines and install, as previously, under %{_datadir}/GNUstep/Documentation. - I'm creating a new gnustep-filesystem subpackage. Packages ought not to require on gnustep-make; it should only be a build requirement. -filesystem currently owns %{_sysconfdir}/GNUstep, %{_libdir}/GNUstep, %{_datadir}/GNUstep and %{_datadir}/GNUstep/Documentation - Complete documentation now built by default. It does not take that long anyway. Previous script to disable it is broken in anycase. One thing we might want to consider is: to follow Mandriva and override the user-specific directory to ~/.gnustep rather than ~/GNUstep, or not. Personally I'd prefer to keep it as before. Axel, thoughts? We're still waiting for a respond to our comaintainership requests too: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gnustep-make *** Bug 517550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 360850 [details]
Latest updated spec file
This addresses Charles' concern: local installations now go to /usr/local/GNUstep, and gnustep-filesystem now owns the default local directories as well.
Turns out my sed scripts that replaced Axel's perl scripts did not catch some of the references to 'lib' as well; these are now properly replaced to %{_lib}.
(In reply to comment #2) > One thing we might want to consider is: to follow Mandriva and override the > user-specific directory to ~/.gnustep rather than ~/GNUstep, or not. Personally > I'd prefer to keep it as before. > > Axel, thoughts? We're still waiting for a respond to our comaintainership > requests too: (The request are done) Is there a reason the mandriva packager decided to rename the directory? While it certainly fits in better with common modern practice it isn't really mandated or suggested by anything. (In reply to comment #4) > This addresses Charles' concern: local installations now go to > /usr/local/GNUstep, and gnustep-filesystem now owns the default local > directories as well. In contrast to above /usr/local is being modeled after /usr with some exceptions, and the goal was to be FHS compliant. I think this needs some more thought, like /usr/local/{share,lib*} paths and similar. > Turns out my sed scripts that replaced Axel's perl scripts did not catch some > of the references to 'lib' as well; these are now properly replaced to %{_lib}. Why did you replace the perl scripts? sed-in-place does not work on all sed incarnations like some older RHEL sibling. gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc11 gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc10 From my side the usage a BuildConflict is not very nice. I hope this is a intermisc solution until we have found a better one. gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnustep-make'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9577 gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnustep-make'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9597 gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. gnustep-make-2.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |