Bug 524457

Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm"
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: sandeep shedmake <sshedmak>
Component: lohit-tamil-fontsAssignee: Pravin Satpute <psatpute>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, ifelix, psatpute, xinsun
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-23 05:34:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 (i.e. without "abvm").
none
ttf file handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 & 0BC2 based syllables
none
patch handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 based syllables none

Description sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 13:08:29 UTC 
Created attachment 361820 [details]
Correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 (i.e. without "abvm").

Description of problem:
glyphs 0BC1 and OBC2 should not have Anchor Point class as "abvm".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc12.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open gedit
2. Input "U+0BB8" + "U+0BC1" 
3. Input "U+0BB8" + "U+0BC2"
  
Actual results:
0BB8 + 0BC1  ==>  ஸு
0BB8 + 0BC2  ==>  ஸூ

Expected results:
see attachment

Additional info:
1) As per http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0B80.pdf,

OBC1  == TAMIL VOWEL SIGN U
OBC2  == TAMIL VOWEL SIGN UU

2) Declaring 0BC1 and OBC2 as "abvm" causes syllable formation "above" the  base-glyph 
(which is wrong behaviour).
Comment 1 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-20 13:52:10 UTC 
Created attachment 361822 [details]
ttf file handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 & 0BC2 based syllables
Comment 2 Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 04:21:54 UTC 
hi felix,
can you confirm this thing?
Comment 3 Felix 2009-09-21 08:02:50 UTC 
From Comment #1

With the attached font file now it is looking fine and perfect.

Eg. the below combination are looking fine:

0BB8 + 0BC1  ==>  ஸு
0BB8 + 0BC2  ==>  ஸூ

Thanks
Comment 4 Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 10:06:52 UTC 
felix thanks,
sandeep can you put submit patch here?
Comment 5 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-21 10:18:06 UTC 
Created attachment 361905 [details]
patch handling correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 based syllables
Comment 6 Pravin Satpute 2009-09-21 12:18:23 UTC 
build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12
will be available in wed. rawhide
Comment 7 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 05:34:09 UTC 
From Comment #6,


Correct behaviour of 0BC1 and 0BC2 based syllables can now be  obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide).


Hence, closing this bug.
Comment 8 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 05:52:40 UTC 
*** Bug 501422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 sandeep shedmake 2009-09-23 05:52:55 UTC 
*** Bug 501424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***