Bug 682007

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14: _dbus_abort: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Paul Lange <palango>
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: alexl, bnocera, soy.el.raze, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:30121ca05de7043e9331dc94f8bf04a5f5973759
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 19:14:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Paul Lange 2011-03-03 21:23:05 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 10086 bytes
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp --spawner :1.10 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/3
component: gvfs
Attached file: coredump, 9117696 bytes
crash_function: _dbus_abort
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686
package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce: 1.don't know
time: 1299186804
uid: 500
Comment 1 Paul Lange 2011-03-03 21:23:08 UTC 
Created attachment 482162 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 jorge 2011-03-26 21:25:48 UTC 
Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Intenté conectarme al servidor remoto.
2. Se calló, creo que hay un problema con conexiones lentas.
3.
Comment 3 abrt-bot 2012-03-20 19:14:40 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #699329, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #608380, bug #608906, bug #663075, bug #699329

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 699329 ***