Bug 715979

Summary: FTBFS clamav-0.97.1-1600.fc16
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: clamavAssignee: Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: cwickert, matt_domsch, nb, ondrejj, redhat-bugzilla, rh-bugzilla, steve
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-13 20:25:20 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 716267, 716460    
Bug Blocks: 713919    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log none

Description FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:49 EDT
clamav-0.97.1-1600.fc16.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
Comment 1 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:52 EDT
Created attachment 508189 [details]
root.log


root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:54 EDT
Created attachment 508190 [details]
build.log


build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:55 EDT
Created attachment 508191 [details]
mock.log


mock.log for i386
Comment 4 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:57 EDT
Created attachment 508192 [details]
root.log


root.log for x86_64
Comment 5 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:50:59 EDT
Created attachment 508193 [details]
build.log


build.log for x86_64
Comment 6 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:51:00 EDT
Created attachment 508194 [details]
mock.log


mock.log for x86_64
Comment 7 Nathanael Noblet 2011-06-23 13:31:44 EDT
A local mock build for rawhide works fine for me. The build.log shows configure complaining about a missing zlib, however root.log shows that zlib is in fact installed.
Comment 8 Nathanael Noblet 2011-06-23 13:32:57 EDT
Also koji reports the version of zlib as 1.2.5-4 / same as the version the root.log shows being installed. I'm confused.
Comment 9 Enrico Scholz 2011-06-23 15:27:47 EDT
I think, this bug is bogus and caused by broken mock/yum behaviour which ignores silently dependency errors in completely unrelated packages:

DEBUG util.py:250:  Error: Package: sendmail-8.14.5-1.fc16.i686 (ftbfs)
DEBUG util.py:250:             Requires: libdb-5.1.so
DEBUG util.py:250:   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
DEBUG util.py:250:   You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
DEBUG util.py:250:  Reading Local RPMDB
Comment 10 Matt Domsch 2011-06-23 15:46:06 EDT
re-opening, until the dependent mock bug is closed.
Comment 11 Christoph Wickert 2011-06-23 16:17:15 EDT
IHMO we should are facing two problems here. One is the mock bug 716267. The other is that sendmail has depsolving problems. sendmail itself is not FTBFS (but needs a rebuild), so the sendmail owner is probably not aware of the problem his package causes. Therefor Enrico should file another bug against sendmail and let it block this one instead of just closing it.