Bug 996176
Summary: | [RFE] Add a hostgroup to Foreman for a deploying an OpenStack Controller node with cinder. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Omri Hochman <ohochman> | |
Component: | openstack-foreman-installer | Assignee: | Jiri Stransky <jstransk> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Omri Hochman <ohochman> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 3.0 | CC: | ajeain, hateya, jguiditt, jstransk, mlopes, morazi, rhos-maint, sclewis, sradvan, yeylon | |
Target Milestone: | beta | Keywords: | FutureFeature, TestOnly | |
Target Release: | 4.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | openstack-foreman-installer-0.0.20-1.el6ost | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
Feature: Add block storage (Cinder) support.
Reason: Previously we did not install Cinder with Foreman.
Result (if any):
* Cinder API has been added to the Controller hostgroups (both "Controller (Neutron)" and "Controller (Nova Network)".
* Cinder storage (where block storage data is stored) has a separate host group "LVM Block Storage", so that the storage capacity is scalable. This host group can be deployed only on hosts where "cinder-volumes" LVM volume group exists.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1027001 1045056 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-12-20 00:19:09 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1010307 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 975499, 1010310, 1027001, 1045056 |
Description
Omri Hochman
2013-08-12 15:04:15 UTC
Upstream code submitted and merged: https://github.com/redhat-openstack/astapor/pull/12 Upstream docs on RDO wiki: http://openstack.redhat.com/Deploying_RDO_Using_Foreman#Cinder_Storage_Nodes Is this really meant to be rhos 3.0? I am pretty sure this code was built only with rhos 4/havana in mind (In reply to Jason Guiditta from comment #3) > Is this really meant to be rhos 3.0? I am pretty sure this code was built > only with rhos 4/havana in mind That's right, it was built on Havana. *** Bug 1027001 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-1859.html |