RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1004128 - Regression fail // broke usage of multi server syntax
Summary: Regression fail // broke usage of multi server syntax
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs
Version: 6.5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ian Kent
QA Contact: Filesystem QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 239361 1018641
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-04 02:51 UTC by JianHong Yin
Modified: 2013-10-14 03:31 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 239361
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-06 02:35:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 2 JianHong Yin 2013-09-04 03:09:43 UTC 
beaker JOB link:
  https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/486719
Comment 4 Ian Kent 2013-09-04 05:10:39 UTC 
(In reply to Yin.JianHong from comment #2)
> beaker JOB link:
>   https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/486719

You need to specify which test motivated you to place this bug.

AFAICS, for the above link, the failures are:

- bz346091 - failed because it detected a NULL procedure
             call which is expected now due to ongoing,
             and needed changes.

- bz495895 - has always been a problem since IPv6 interfaces
             have been present. The check for how many DNS
             lookups are expected is wrong and I've been unable
             has to fix it several times now. Just how many DNS
             lookup we should see is questionable as well, but
             the original problem had many, much more than is
             seen in the log of the test run. IOW, the actual
             result of the test result is acceptable.

bz239361, bz239370 - looks like transient DNS lookup failures.
             I didn't see those failures in a recent run that
             I did so I have to concluded this is some glitch
             in the environment at the time of the test runs.

- bz212249 - looks like it might be a regression of some sort
             and does warrant investigation. But which of these
             bugs should be used to follow up with it I don't
             know?

Ian
Comment 5 Ian Kent 2013-09-06 02:35:57 UTC 
This has to have been an environmental problem at the time the
test was run.

This test has worked OK for me a couple of time recently, for
example:
https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/488640

Ian
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.